Skip to content

Castan Centre for Human Rights Law

The official blog

Home
About
Categories

Category: Implied freedom of political communication

High Court delivers landmark ruling validating abortion clinic ‘safe access zones’

Published April 12, 2019 by Castan Centre in Abortion, Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication, Reproductive Rights, Women's Rights

Leave a comment

High Court rules Tasmanian anti-protest law unconstitutional

Published October 20, 2017April 3, 2018 by Castan Centre in Constitutional Law, Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication

Is liking something on Facebook ‘protected political speech’?

Published August 15, 2017August 15, 2017 by Melissa Castan in Australia, Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication

The High Court – coming to a Centre Stage near you

Published November 19, 2013November 20, 2013 by Sarah Joseph in Australia, Australian Law, Constitutional Law, Freedom of Expression, High Court, Implied freedom of political communication, Inconsistency of Laws, Same sex rights, Separation of powers

Leave a comment

Public servants and free speech

Published August 15, 2013 by Sarah Joseph in Constitutional Law, Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication, Social media

Is the Max Brenner protestors’ court victory an Australian legal watershed?

Published August 1, 2012 by Adam Fletcher in Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication, Victorian Charter

Leave a comment

An Insatiable Appetite for National Security

Published July 17, 2012 by Adam Fletcher in Civil and political rights, Implied freedom of political communication, Terrorism

The High Court and the Freedom of Political Communication

Published December 5, 2010January 22, 2015 by Melissa Castan in Australian Law, Constitutional Law, Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication

Defamation, Twitter and Free Speech

Published November 28, 2010March 17, 2012 by Sarah Joseph in Chris Mitchell, Constitutional Law, Freedom of Expression, Implied freedom of political communication, Julie Posetti, Media, Social media

Subscribe to our blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 10,564 other followers

Staff

andreaolivaresjones
Azadeh Dastyari
Castan Centre
Guest
Joanna Kyriakakis
mariaosullivan
Marius Smith
Melissa Castan
patrickemerton
Dr Paula Gerber
Sarah Joseph
Ronli Sifris
Tania Penovic

All Categories

All Categories

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

Castan Centre Twitter Feed

When #HumanRights are limited, lawmakers must make clear to the public what is expected of them. In the context of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago

Top Posts

Do I have to provide my name on my Census form?
The High Court and the Freedom of Political Communication
Explainer: what are the laws mandating self-isolation and how will they be enforced?
Prior v QUT & ors – what does it all mean?
Welcoming our new team members
Changes at the Castan Centre
Religious Discrimination Bill backfires on Christians
Abolish the Joint Committee on Human Rights? We should be strengthening it instead…
The Legality of Manus Island detention under Australian law - The High Court decides in Plaintiff S195
Dutton’s duty: the Minister’s responsibility to provide a safe and lawful abortion

Search for:

Meta

Register
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.com

RSS - Posts
RSS - Comments

Archives

Archives

Disclaimer

Posts on this blog represent the views of the individual authors and not Castan Centre policy. Comments are welcome, but inflammatory, offensive or irrelevant comments will be removed.

Blog at WordPress.com.